Here at The BBC, we take great pleasure in mocking Michigan fans. For longer than I care to remember, they had the upper hand on us, having won 10 out of 13 games over Ohio State (thank you, John Cooper).....and they were arrogant about it.

In my world, payback's a bitch. So I have no qualms whatsoever about pointing out their feeble attempts to remain relevant in the college football world (and especially in The Rivalry).

The latest laugh I have had at Michigan fans involves their opener for the 2010 football season. When Michigan's Athletic Department announced that a new opener was being signed to a contract, the denizens of Ann Arbor found themselves in a frenzy of joy. They actually labeled it as "a real opponent", and Brian at MGoBlog rattled off a long list of teams that were possible and/or likely to be the mystery opponent. Among the potential opponents;

• LSU
• Cal
• Oklahoma State
• Georgia
• Oregon State

All of them quality opponents with a lot to offer both Michigan and the college football world. Any of these would be big, big news.

Imagine my laughter when the word escaped that the home-and-home BIG BIG announcement was that Michigan would open 2010 by playing host to.....Connecticut.

As an admittedly biased Ohio State fan, even I would begin to tout the benefits of playing Connecticut if the tables were turned....but the discussion has gone from biased fan to sycophantic worship in Wolverineville.

Today, the aforementioned Michigan blog actually posted the phrase "Kudos to Martin for scheduling the Huskies." They struggled so hard to make it seem like Connecticut was THE best choice for Michigan football. Among the other "ZOMG this is teh AWESOME" points from that blog up north;

• Praising UConn's 34-29 record over the past five years, despite that barely-over .500 record being compiled in the Big East.
• Having a 2-1 record in bowl games. They failed to mention who they defeated in bowls. Their wins? Against Buffalo in the International Bowl, and Toledo in the Glass Bowl. Wow.
• They posted a picture of a player at Connecticut. That player doesn't even play at UConn anymore.

But the most asinine comment of the day was used against Michigan fans who were reminding everyone that at least Ohio State plays USC and Penn State will play Alabama.

...it is far harder to schedule and defeat a big-name opponent in real life than it is in a video game (I note your examples of Alabama-Penn State, and Ohio State-USC and counter with the seven mediocre opponents that PSU and OSU combine for OOC this year).

You can "note" an example of USC all you want, guys...but guess who is among those "seven mediocre opponents" that MGoBlog is pooh-poohing???

Please take note that the previous game was played back when Sam McGuffie was still considered "tough".

Actually, having re-watched that highlight of Michigan losing to Toledo (at home), maybe Michigan should have gone with an easier opponent. UConn might embarrass the Weenies after all.