For the second straight week we go all “in loco parentis” for SBP… here’s the soundtrack to match, from back in the day. Or as I call it, “The Day”.
Welp, here we are Buckaroos… the Basket Bucks and Football version both have two game losing streaks. Nevertheless, there’s great things happening in Columbus…. give this a listen as we dive right in.
On New Year’s Eve, Penn State lost their head coach to the NFL.
Bill O’Brien, who took on the enormous task of manning a wounded Lions program two years ago, left the college game for the NFL. He will now lead the Houston Texans, another franchise that needs rebuilding (but that’s another story for another time).
When O’Brien arrived at Penn State, many believed that the once-heralded team in Happy Valley was at death’s door. NCAA sanctions and a devastated reputation left the entire school in shambles, and it was going to be at least a decade before they could begin the recovery process.
The critics were wrong.
O’Brien turned PSU around in quick order. A 7-5 record in 2013 was unexpected, and so were two victories over two giants of the Big Ten. Wins over Michigan and Wisconsin, both ranked at the time, highlighted the 2013 season and took away the pain of their 63-14 destruction at the hands of Ohio State.
But now O’Brien is off to greener pastures and Penn State fans are feeling betrayed again.
I share no love for Penn State fans, having watched their willful ignorance over Joe Paterno’s enabling behavior during the crimes of the Jerry Sandusky scandal. They threw Sandusky to the wolves as they should have, but repeatedly buried their heads in the sand when shown undeniable proof that Paterno was complicit in allowing the unmentionable crimes to continue unabated.
But with O’Brien’s departure, I feel their pain. Their head coach made promises to Penn State, and he has now broken them by leaving before the end of his contract.
If a player at Penn State decided to leave for a different school after two years, he’d likely be forced to sit out for a full year before he could take the field again. (Yes, I’m aware there are situations that allow a player to avoid being put on a shelf for a year, but that is the exception rather than the rule).
Should a coach of an NCAA program not be held to the same standards as the players he recruits? If a coach convinces a player to attend his university, should both men be asked to stay for the same length of time or face minor penalties?
When Bill O’Brien sat in the home of a recruit in January of 2012 and told him that he would be a part of the rebirth at Penn State, there was no mention that the coach might be gone by the end of the player’s sophomore year at PSU.
That player will not have an easy time changing schools, now that his coach has abandoned him. The NCAA has rules that will make his life difficult if he wishes to transfer to a different school (it goes well beyond sitting out a year and deep into bureaucracy). Even if he is skilled enough to succeed at the next level, laws forbid him from jumping to the NFL until he is three years removed from his high school football years.
That being said, is it time to place rules on college coaches that leave their programs before their contracts expire? Should coaches have to sit out a year before they can take on another job within the college ranks?
Obviously, the NCAA cannot mandate rules in the NFL for such situation – unless Roger Goodell behaves like he did towards Jim Tressel and Terrelle Pryor, having doled out suspensions for both men when they entered the NFL. But within the NCAA, can the same rules be applied to coaches and players?
Yes, the NCAA rule book is already a mess and it should be tightened up immediately. I propose that the rules for coaches are included in the next set of changes. Read More
Well, you’ve got all day to plan your attack for tonight… personally, I’ve got plans to go to “all the candy is on sale” day tomorrow. We’re digging through our country albums for today’s soundtracks; one goofy, one “creepy”. Country not your thing? Well remember, we used to think this and this were OK as well.
You can’t tell me that you were surprised.
I have a hard time believing that anyone, particularly Ohio State fans, thought that the NCAA’s decision regarding Miami’s morass would be severe.
If you were, then I have some lovely desert space in that state up north to sell you.
That Tuesday’s announcement of the Hurricane program finally receiving it’s clarification following a two year process filled with grandstanding, ineptitude, and foot dragging would shock some folks is difficult to fathom. In spite of the allegations, in spite of the evidence and information gathered by an outside source, in spite of what seemed to be a tsunami of facts and accounts that was described as “the biggest scandal in college sports”, the NCAA’s decision to accept Miami’s self imposed sanctions and add a few minor flourishes was just the latest in the long decline in that Association’s ability to be considered integrous.
Actually, that’s not correct. Being consistently inconsistent has a certain integrity of it’s own, right? Broken clocks being right twice daily and all that.
Before we go much further, let me state that this is not an attempt to critique the Hurricane program or it’s fans. I’ve long believed that consequences should be levied at the players/coaches/administrators who were involved, and am glad that the ‘Canes are now able to move past Damocles’ sword and instead focus on the upcoming run at an ACC/BCS title.
However, it’s difficult to not see Tuesday’s decision as anything other than a justification for what many have been calling for in a while- a complete overhaul of the NCAA’s “judicial” arm, if not a full dissolution of the Association itself. Read More
Welcome to Monday Musings, glad that you decided to stop in. Grab your beverage of choice and let’s get to this. If you’re at work, I’d suggest something refreshing, but not too stimulating. If you’re at home, it probably won’t matter. And, since this is Labor Day, I’m guessing it’s possibly the latter.
I have two short videos for you today; one on Omega-3′s and breast cancer with Dr. Farrar of The James and the other on coffee’s effect in preventing basal cell carcinoma, with Dr. Trotter.
On a related note, I come across these videos, and other information via Twitter. So can you. Do so @TheJamesOSU
I can see why Coach Meyer followed me to Twitter. OK, look, he actually doesn’t ‘Follow’ me in Twitter sense, he just created his Twitter account after I did.
At the start of the week the NCAA announced a set of rules changes for men’s and women’s basketball that will take effect immediately for the 2013-2014 season. Rules changes happen every year and are often met with mixed reactions however this year’s rules changes will likely be met with enthusiasm by most fans who have been calling for these things for years. As someone who officiated high school basketball before I moved to Australia, I have often found myself with differing views on rules and officiating than the average fan. In today’s article I take a look at the rules changes from both the perspective of a fan and that of an official.
The first set of rules changes concern the use of replay in a game. In a move that should please lots of fans, officials will now for the first time be able to use the replay monitor to confirm a shot-clock violation or determine who caused the ball to go out of bounds on a deflection involving multiple players, however this rule only applies in the final two minutes or regulation or overtime. Fans have been calling for an increased use of replay for years and the deflected ball going out of bounds is probably one of the situations where fans have most wanted replay to be used; well it seems the NCAA actually listened to fans for a change and responded. In general I think this new expansion of the replay rules seems like it will be a good thing, both the shot clock violation and deflected ball plays are bang-bang plays that are tough to call in real time and which replay can greatly improve the accuracy of the call. The thing I do not like about this rule is that it only applies in the final two minutes of regulation and overtime. While I understand the need to keep replays from happening too often, this new rule just furthers the mistaken idea that the final minutes of the game are special and should be called differently than other parts of the game. Yes, an incorrect call made in the closing minutes gives the teams less time to respond and overcome that mistake but imagine the following situation: team A is in the middle of a big run early in the second half and has all the momentum and the crowd behind them when team B hits a big three pointer as the shot clock expires only to have the shot waived off due to a shot clock violation that turns out to be in error and which could have been fixed had the officials been able to go replay. Instead of quieting the crowd and disrupting team A’s momentum, team B is still on the wrong side of a scoring run and team A and its fans are probably even more fired up now and have even more momentum on their side; do you think team B would still say that the missed called was less important than one that might occur in the final two minutes?