Iowa post-game comment

Written January 24th, 2013 by Ken

A couple of things before we get started. I want to give a h/t to Tim, as well as Joe and Eric, who put together the post-game recaps in such short order. Nice job, guys. Next, after the Iowa game, I am so glad that I don’t have BTN on our base cable package.

I want to address a couple areas that bothered me, and seemingly others, about the win against Iowa. These are turnovers and rebounding, specifically offensive rebounding. In this article, I’m going to define certain things the way I see them. If your definitions differ, your conclusions are likely to be just as valid. Stats used in this article are from the great website –

Regarding turnovers, I consider them a lost opportunity, an empty possession. With OSU’s points-per-possession (PPP) of 1.11, each empty possession is significant, particularly in conference games. OSU had three more turnovers than Iowa, so there’s potentially 3 points left on the floor. Ohio State’s turnovers per game have increased the past four times on the floor, so the trend is in the wrong direction. I’m sure Thad is addressing this, since it seems uncharacteristic for this team.

Now, on to rebounding; as Tim pointed out in the recap that rebounding in the Iowa game was unacceptable. Truer words have never been spoken.

Read More

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE
Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE